Why Sushil Kumar’s bail was canceled by the Supreme Court, surrender will have to be done within 1 week, the bench said- the court against the accused …

Last updated:

Why Supreme Court Sets Aside Order Granting Bail to Sushil Kumar: Sushil Kumar’s bail has been canceled by the Supreme Court. They have been instructed to surrender within a week. Olympian wrestler Sushil Kumar Nash …Read more

Why Sushil Kumar's bail was canceled by the Supreme Court, the bench said- the court ...Sushil Kumar has been instructed to surrender within a week.

New Delhi, Supreme Court canceled the bail of two -time Olympic medalist wrestler Sushil Kumar, The Supreme Court has instructed Sushil Kumar to surrender within a week, canceling the bail to Sushil Kumar in the murder of former junior national wrestling champion Sagar Dhankhar in 2021 at Chhatrasal Stadium., A bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra mentioned the allegations made in the FIR that said that to repay the national capital ,Criminal Arena ‘ It was made and the law was not cared for. The court directed Kumar to surrender in the court concerned within a week.

Sagar Dhankar against the bail order of Peeth Delhi High Court on March 4 (Sagar Dhankad) He was hearing the appeal filed by the father of the of. Sushil Kumar (Sushil Kumar) And others are accused of killing Dhankar in May 2021 over an alleged property dispute and injuring two of his friends. The bench said, ‘Undoubtedly, the accused (Kumar) is a well -known wrestler and Olympian who has represented the country internationally. There is no doubt that they have social influence. However, the judgment said that the possibility of delaying their ‘influence’ or trial proceedings on the witnesses cannot be ruled out.

Allegations related to pressurizing the witnesses were made before the bail order was passed and some witnesses filed a complaint in writing, fearing their lives at the behest of Kumar. The bench mentioned that after registering the FIR, Kumar was absconding and avoided arrest. He was eventually arrested on 23 May 2021. The bench said, “The court should also be aware of the seriousness of the allegations made against the accused.”

The Supreme Court said that the accused allegedly kidnapped some people, attacked them with dangerous weapons and caused serious injuries, resulting in the victim’s unfortunate death. The prosecution also recorded in the record that whenever Kumar was granted temporary bail on five occasions, the prosecution witnesses were clearly rebuked during the testimony. The bench said, ‘Though, in this stage we avoid putting our seal on it, but it is noteworthy that this form underlines the possibility that the accused can interfere in the case. It is worth noting that 28 have retracted out of 35 witnesses with the recorded statement.

The Supreme Court said that granting bail is a discretionary judicial measure, in which it is necessary to create a subtle and reference-sensitive balance between legal and social interests. The bench said, “On the one hand it is necessary to protect the personal freedom of the accused, on the other hand, the court should also be equally conscious about the severity of the alleged crime, the widespread social impact of the release of the accused and the need to maintain the impartiality and hearing of the hearing and the hearing.”

The Supreme Court insisted on making a balanced assessment of all these, with the form of allegations and seriousness, the strength of the case being absconding or the possibility of tampering of witnesses while using judicial discretion in bail cases, as well as ‘paramount interest’, as well as ‘paramount interest’, that is not affected, that the lawsuit is not affected.

Referring to the former decisions given on the issue, the bench said that the appeal against granting bail cannot be considered the same as an application to cancel the bail. The bench said, ‘The appeal against bail should not be allowed to be used as a ventilative measure. The court said that the High Court had granted bail to Kumar with the serious nature of the crime, the apprehension of the accused affecting the trial and his conduct during the investigation., The Supreme Court clarified that his comments are only to investigate the order to grant bail and they should not be taken as an opinion on the merits of the case., The apex court said that Kumar will be allowed to apply for bail again if there is a change in the circumstances.,

The subordinate court had framed various charges against Kumar in October 2022 under the Indian Penal Code, including murder, as well as allegations under arms law and other sections.,

Authorimg

Kamlesh raiChief Sub Editor

Active in journalism for nearly 15 years. Study from Delhi University. Interest in sports, especially in cricket, badminton, boxing and wrestling. IPL, Commonwealth Games and Pro Wrestling League events have been covered. From February 2022 …Read more

Active in journalism for nearly 15 years. Study from Delhi University. Interest in sports, especially in cricket, badminton, boxing and wrestling. IPL, Commonwealth Games and Pro Wrestling League events have been covered. From February 2022 … Read more

Homesports

Why Sushil Kumar’s bail was canceled by the Supreme Court, the bench said- the court …

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *