New Delhi31 minutes ago
- Copy link
Wardon argued that he had scolded the student as a parent, so that he would not make any such mistake.
The Supreme Court said that scolding no one can be considered an excitement for suicide. Along with this, the court rejected the order of the Madras High Court. The High Court held a hostel wardon guilty of provoking suicide under the IPC’s Cast 306.
A bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra said, “No one can think that scolding can lead to such an incident.” Wardon scolded another student on the complaint of a student.
After being scolded, the student committed suicide by hanging himself in his room. Wardon argued that he had scolded the student as a parent, so that he would not make any such mistake. Wardon also made it clear that there was no personal relationship between him and the suicide students.
Earlier, harassment was not considered an abolition of suicide
In December 2024, the Supreme Court had said that a person can be blamed for the abetment of someone’s suicide only when there is a strong evidence of this. The charge of harassment is not enough for this.
In fact, the Gujarat High Court refused to acquit a woman’s harassment and forcing her to commit suicide. A bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice PB Varlet acquitted the High Court’s decision. Read full news …
Breakup is not considered provoking suicide
Earlier in November 2024, the Supreme Court had admitted that breaking a breakup or marriage promise could not be provoked for suicide. However, the person may be emotionally disturbed when such promises are broken. If he suicide, no other person can be considered a criminal for this.
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, gave the decision of the Karnataka High Court. The High Court convicted the accused Kamaruddin Dastagir Sunadi for cheating and provoking suicide from his girlfriend.
The High Court sentenced the accused to jail for 5 years in jail and 25 thousand fine. However, the trial court acquitted the accused. The case was heard by a bench of Justices Pankaj Mittal and Ujjal Bhuyan. He considered the case as a normal breakup case, not considering the criminal case.
,
Read these news related to Supreme Court …
Rebuke to Rajasthan government; SC asked- Why are students giving life in quota, what did you do to stop it
The Supreme Court on May 23 reprimanded the Rajasthan government in the student suicide case. The bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan said, ‘So far this year 14 students have committed suicide in Kota. What are you doing with this? Why are students committing suicide in Kota itself. Read full news …
SC said- The rape case is wrong after breaking the relationship, this spoils the image of the accused
The Supreme Court said in a judgment on 29 May, “If the relationship between two adults is broken later or the distance between the two comes, it cannot be made a case of rape by calling it a false promise of marriage.” The bench of Justice Biwi Nagratna and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma made this comment. Read full news …