Supreme Court Said- If the Guardian Backets A Robber, then Punishment is Necessary | The Supreme Court said-If the protector becomes a looter, then it is necessary to punish: ITBP retained the dismissal of the jawan; Was guilty of cash robbery 20 years ago

The case is in 2005, when the ITBP jawan was fired in the cash robbery case.

The Supreme Court, while giving a verdict in the 20 -year -old case, said that when the patron becomes a looter, it becomes necessary to punish him. With this, the court has upheld the decision of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), which dismissed a constable in the cash robbery case.

The case is of the year 2005, the constable was given the responsibility of security of the cash box brought for the salary of the soldiers. Later, the constable broke the box and took the cash withdrawn. ITBP fired him from his job. Later the soldiers reached the Uttarakhand High Court, where the court asked ITBP to reconsider its decision. Then the matter reached the Supreme Court.

A bench of Justices Suryakant and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh in the Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the order of the Uttarakhand High Court, saying that it is the duty of the disciplinary authority to give proper punishment to the constable found guilty in such crimes.

The court said- When it comes to security forces, the responsibility increases The Supreme Court, while giving its verdict, said that, where it is a matter of responsibility, then there should be more feeling in paramilitary forces. Where discipline, morality, loyalty, dedication to service and credibility are essential for jobs.

The court said that Constable Jageshwar Singh was a member of a disciplined paramilitary force, posted in a sensitive border area. He was given the responsibility of security of the cash box. However, he broke the cash box bypassing his faith and trust.

Now know what is the whole matter Constable Jageshwar Singh was admitted to the ITBP on November 30, 1990 and was doing duty as a orange in the quota of July 4-5, 2005, where the soldiers were keeping cash boxes filled with lakhs of rupees to be given as salary.

Singh allegedly broke the lock and took cash, then hid the cash box at a distance of about 200 yards from the quota and ran away from the post. When the incident company commander came to know, he immediately searched the surrounding area as well as a vehicle going towards Uttarkashi, but the accused escaped.

The Company Commander then reported the case to the Commanding Officer of the Battalion and later on July 6, 2005, an FIR was lodged against the constable. The FIR was followed by the Court of Inquiry, in which the jawan was found guilty.

On being arrested, the jawan confessed the crime after which he was dismissed from service on 14 November 2005. The jawan later challenged the dismissal decision in the High Court and claimed that his statement was given under pressure.

However, the High Court did not agree with his argument that he had made a statement under pressure, but he had asked ITBP to reconsider his decision to punish the dismissal.

,

Read this news too …

Supreme Court refuses to judicial inquiry into the Pahalgam attack, said- Do you want to bring the morale of the security forces, do not bring such applications

The Supreme Court has refused to order a judicial inquiry into the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Along with this, a bench of Justices Suryakant and NK Singh also reprimanded the petitioner. The court said that this is a sensitive time. The whole country is united and stands against terrorism. Do you want to bring the morale of the security force? Do not bring such petitions in court. Read full news …