Rajasthan Royals Insurance dispute in Supreme Court, Sreesanth injury case postponed

Last updated:

The order to give Rs 82 lakh on Sreesanth’s injury to the owner of Rajasthan Royals has been challenged by the United Insurance Company in the Supreme Court, the case was postponed for documents.

Insurance company not ready to give money to RR, Supreme Court reached the caseS Sreesanth has played for Rajasthan Royals
New Delhi. The insurance company insuring the owner of ‘Rajasthan Royals’ for the 2012 Indian Premier League has approached the Supreme Court. The company has challenged the order of the National Consumer Disputes Prevention Commission (NCDRC). In this, he was given the franchise owner S. It was instructed to pay more than Rs 82 lakh due to Sreesanth’s injury. Sreesanth was unable to play in the tournament at that time.

On Monday 1 September, Justice Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta postponed the case so that the appellant could submit additional documents. This includes applications submitted by the respondent who received insurance and necessary documents (such as Sreesanth’s fitness certificate).

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati asked for the appellant-unit insurance company that the disputed order saw Sreesanth’s issue of an already existing foot injury. Which had no relation with a knee injury (occurred during the insurance period). The appellars were non -disclose to the toe, not on the relationship between the two injuries.

Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul appeared for the response (Royal Multisort Private Limited) and argued that the already existing leg injury, due to which the claim was rejected by the appellant, does not make Sreesanth unable to play. Rather, it was a knee injury that occurred during the insurance period, which made him disqualified.

The senior lawyer further stated that the policy obtained in this case is to ensure that the players who get hurt during the tournament (who are disqualified in playing) are paid by the BCCI and the team concerned. “Toe injury did not stop him from playing. He was playing! He suffered a knee injury during the practice session!”

Kaul also said that when Sreesanth joined, the appellant was given a certificate (about fitness), and the next certificate was given when he suffered a knee injury. In response to this, Justice Mehta asked, “Is that certificate revealed to a foot injury? It is essential by Claus (E).” The bench also commented orally that if the already existing leg injury was revealed, the appellant could consider insuring the player or charging high premium.

Authorimg

Viplove kumar

Sports active with journalism for more than 15 years. ETV worked in the cricket website of India, Zee News. Sports head was in Dainik Jagran website. Olympic, Commonwealth, Cricket and Football World Cup covered. October …Read more

Sports active with journalism for more than 15 years. ETV worked in the cricket website of India, Zee News. Sports head was in Dainik Jagran website. Olympic, Commonwealth, Cricket and Football World Cup covered. October … Read more

Homecrick

Insurance company not ready to give money to RR, Supreme Court reached the case

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *