Pahalgam Terror Attack: Depended Tourist Martyr Status: Punjab Haryana High Court Dismisses Petition | Pahalgam attack, the martyr’s status to the dead dismissed: The High Court said-it is not our job to make stories; 26 died including lieutenant – Haryana News

Vinay Narwal, the lieutenant of Karnal, was also killed in the terrorist attack in Pahalgam.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday (May 20) rejected the PIL demanding martyr status to 26 people killed in the Pahalgam attack. The judgment of the High Court Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumit Goel gave the verdict. The court said, “Court not

,

The bench also asked the petitioner to write his demand or complaint to the appropriate officer or authority. After this, his demand will be considered within 30 days.

In fact, Lieutenant Vinay Narwal of Karnal was also killed in the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April. He went on a honeymoon with his wife Himanshi.

The court asked- Does it come in Article 226? During the hearing, Chief Justice Sheel Nagu asked the petitioner, “Does declaring him come under Article 226? If this is the case then give an example. Can the court take such a decision? The government should take this decision, because it is their job.

Responding to this, petitioner Advocate Ayush Ahuja said, “Innocent tourists were shot by terrorists in the name of religion, he should face him like a soldier.”

The Center had said- the petitioner does not know what the government is doing Opposing the petition, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Satya Pal Jain had earlier said on behalf of the central government, “The petitioner does not know what the Government of India is doing. Home Minister reached Srinagar the same evening. We are on the verge of war with another country. It is not time to raise such issues, we are giving priority to other things.

Court has said- should consider However, Chief Justice Sheel Nagu said during the first hearing, “Even if a soldier dies, he should be considered for the award, but it is not given immediately. It takes time. It usually takes at least one year time. It will also pronounce the verdict in this matter. The verdict was reserved on 6 May.

We are updating this news …

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *