New Delhi24 minutes ago
- Copy link
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey said that, now when Parliament sits, this issue will be raised.
The dispute of the Supreme Court on the order given to the President is increasing. BJP MP Nishikant Dubey said that the President is appointed as the Chief Justice of India. How can you instruct an appointment authority. Parliament enacts the law of this country. Will you instruct that Parliament?
Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna is responsible for the civil war in the country. The Supreme Court is going out of its limits. If everyone has to go to the Supreme Court for all matters, then Parliament and Assembly should be closed.
Actually, this matter was raised from the dispute between the Tamil Nadu Governor and the State Government. The Supreme Court on 8 April ordered that the Governor has no veto power. At the same time, the President will have to take a decision on the bill within 3 months. The order came to light on 11 April.
What has happened on the dispute so far…
17 April: Dhankhar said- courts cannot order the President
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar was addressing a group of Rajya Sabha intern on 17 April. During this time, he objected to the advice of the Supreme Court, in which the President and the governors had set a deadline for approving the bills.
Dhankhar had said- “The courts cannot order the President. The special rights under Article 142 of the Constitution have become 24×7 available nuclear missile against democratic powers. Judges are acting as a super parliamentary.”
April 18: Sibal said- President nominal head in India
Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal said that when the executive does not work, the judiciary will have to intervene. The President is the head of the nominal head in India. The President-Governor has to work on the advice of governments. I am surprised to hear the Vice President, I am also sad. They should not talk to any party.
Referring to a decision of the Supreme Court on 24 June 1975, Sibal said- ‘People will remember when the decision on Indira Gandhi’s election came, only one judge, Justice Krishna Iyer ruled. At that time Indira had to lose Sansadi. Then Dhankhar ji approved this. But now the decision of the two -judge bench against the government is being questioned.
Controversy started with this decision of Supreme Court
The Supreme Court had set the limit of the authority of the Governor in the case of the Tamil Nadu Governor and the State Government on 8 April. The bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan had said, “The Governor has no veto power.” The Supreme Court also termed the government’s 10 essential bills being stopped by the Governor as illegal.
During this decision, the court also clarified the situation on the bill sent by the Governors to the President. The Supreme Court had said that the President would have to take a decision on the bill sent by the Governor within 3 months. The order was made public on 11 April.
Read this news too …
Vice President said- The courts cannot order the President: Judge is acting like ‘Super Parliament’
Dhankhar Said that the courts cannot order the President. He said that under Article 142 of the Constitution, the special right to the court has become 24×7 available nuclear missile against democratic powers. The judges are acting like a super parliament. Read full news …
