The case of the claim of being a Shiva temple in the Dargah of Khwaja Moinuddin Hasan Chishti in Ajmer has reached the High Court. Today, hearing the petition of Anjuman Syed Jadgan (the temple claim) was heard in the court of Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani.
,
Committee counsel Ashish Kumar Singh and Vagish Kumar Singh said- The Supreme Court has stayed any such suit in any court hearing.
This order was given on a petition challenging the legal recognition of the Placeage of Versecript Act 1991. Even after that, Ajmer Civil Court is listening to this suit. In such a situation, its hearing should be stopped.
During the hearing in the High Court today, Additional Solicitor General RD Rastogi, on behalf of the Central Government, opposed the petition of the Anjuman Committee and said- there is no party in the committee suit.
In such a situation, she cannot file a petition in the High Court. These petitions are not able to play. The court will now hear the case again after a week.
First of all know- what is the Placeage of Vership Act
Now read- what is Ajmer Dargah dispute
- On September 25, 2024, Hindu Army President Vishnu Gupta filed a petition in the Civil Court of Ajmer. The 38 -page petition claimed to have a Shiva temple inside the dargah of Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti.
- Gupta gave 2 years research and a book at Ajmer Sharif Dargah ‘Ajmer: Historic and Descriptive’ Cited It was told that there is a Shiva temple under the dargah.
- On 27 November, the petitioner’s counsel Yogesh Siroja put facts in front of the bench of Civil Judge Manmohan Chandel. The court approved the petition.
- The court issued a notice to the Ajmer Dargah Committee, Ministry of Minorities and Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and from this the entire controversy started …
Vishnu Gupta, who claimed to have a temple in the dargah, formed a Hindu army in 2011. This organization has no relation with the RSS or Shiv Sena.
Three grounds of the claim of Vishnu Gupta, the national president of the Hindu Army …
- Doors texture and carving: The elevated door present in the dargah is like the door of Hindu temples. Seeing the carving, it can also be guessed that there must have been a Hindu temple here before.
- Upper Structure: If you see the upper structure of the dargah, it also shows things like the remains of Hindu temples. Looking at the domes, it can be easily guessed that a Hindu temple has been broken and the dargah has been constructed here.
- Water and waterfalls: Wherever there is a Shiva temple, there are water and waterfalls. Here (Ajmer Dargah) is also the same.
What did the secretary of Anjuman Committee say on 17 April …
Ajmer Civil Court next hearing will be held on April 19
- In the last hearing (24 January) in the Dargah case, the Dargah Committee sought some time from the court. In the petition, the Dargah Committee had said- ‘The petition filed by the plaintiff is not hearing. ,
- On this, the court sought an answer from the national president of the Hindu Army Vishnu Gupta. He presented a reply. After which the Dargah Committee sought time. After this, the court gave the date of March 1 for the next hearing. On March 1, Ajmer remained closed over the Bijayanagar scandal.
- The band was supported by the District Bar Association. In such a situation, work is suspended. Due to this the hearing was postponed. The next date was given 19 April.
,
Read this news related to Ajmer Dargah dispute too …
Demanded to stop the writ petition in the High Court on the claim of the Shiva temple in the Dargah; Cited low fees and 1955 acts
Khwaja Moinuddin Hasan Chishti’s Dargah’s Dargah Dargah’s Dargah Anjuman Syed Jadgan has introduced a writ in the High Court to stop hearing of the suit claiming the temple in the dargah. Read full news …
